CODiii
CODiii is a web-based AI document assistant for architects and engineers that compares specifications, schedules, drawing notes, and related files so coordination gaps surface with citations before they turn into RFIs.
Teams in architecture and engineering use CODiii to scan a project document set for places where specifications, schedules, hardware selections, and room data disagree. Findings are grouped with severity hints and tied back to the exact passage in each source file so reviewers can confirm issues before work moves to the field.
Natural-language research accepts typed or spoken questions and returns answers scoped to material you uploaded, while a compliance-oriented scan highlights prioritized issues with references. The vendor describes the assistant as grounded in your project files, with optional web augmentation switched off by default so responses trace to documents you control rather than the open internet.
Commentary from OQULi leadership in trade press notes that complex building projects can involve on the order of hundreds of discrete information handoffs where context may be lost between stakeholders (AIA EC Digest, 2025). CODiii is positioned as an assistive layer that plugs into existing folders instead of forcing a wholesale move to a new repository.
Public pricing on codiii.com lists per-seat annual Starter costs for small teams, stepped Studio pricing for mid-size practices, and Firm pricing for large organizations with higher document ceilings and custom options; confirm current numbers in writing before purchase. A desktop sync workflow was listed as coming soon at time of writing for right-click uploads from local directories.
Specifications
Pricing
Platforms
Used for
Used by
Tasks
Pros and cons
Pros
- Highlights inconsistencies across several document types before field-driven RFIs stack up
- Defaults to project-grounded answers with optional web research turned off unless you enable it
- Lists public seat bands and annual pricing anchors on the vendor website for initial budgeting
Cons
- Desktop right-click sync was marked as not yet generally available when this listing was prepared
- Mid-tier and enterprise quotes still need vendor contact for exact annual totals inside published ranges
- Scan quality depends on how complete and consistent your uploaded set is
Key features
Cross-document checks: Compare specifications, schedules, and notes to spot mismatches such as hardware types, widths, or fire ratings with risk labels.
Traceable findings: Open each item with links to the underlying file so you can verify text before acting on it.
Project-grounded Q&A: Ask questions in plain language and receive answers tied to uploaded documents instead of generic chat output.
Compliance tracking: Review prioritized scan results with references back to source pages.
Tiered team plans: Starter, Studio, and Firm options scale seat counts, document limits, and support depth for different practice sizes.
Pricing
Starter (annual, per seat)
per year (12 mo)
$1,990.00
Listed for 1 to 10 seats on codiii.com; includes per-project document limits. Verify on vendor site before purchase.
Studio (annual)
per year (12 mo)
$33,000.00
Vendor lists a starting annual price for 11 to 49 seats and a typical upper band near 147,000 USD per year depending on team size and needs. Confirm in writing.
Firm (annual)
per year (12 mo)
$200,000.00
Vendor lists a starting annual price for 50 plus seats with custom pricing, volume discounts, and API access on larger deals. Engage vendor for security and integration details.
Frequently asked questions
How much does CODiii cost for a small architecture firm?
- The public marketing site lists Starter pricing at roughly 1,990 USD per seat per year for teams in the roughly one-to-ten seat range, with higher Studio and Firm bands for larger groups. Promotions and contract terms change totals, so pull the latest figures from codiii.com before you finalize a budget.
Do I have to migrate all project files into a new cloud to use CODiii?
- Vendor messaging says CODiii connects to files where they already live instead of requiring a full migration. You should still validate connector behavior, retention rules, and any local agent or security requirements with OQULi so they match your IT and client policies.
Can CODiii replace my code consultant or authority having jurisdiction review?
- The product is described as assistive software that surfaces inconsistencies for qualified people to interpret, not as a substitute for professional code analysis or official approvals. Use it to shorten manual cross-reading, not to replace licensed judgment on code and contract obligations.
What kinds of documents does CODiii read?
- Homepage examples include specifications, schedules, room data sheets, and drawing-adjacent notes, with emphasis on contradictions between those sources. Supported formats, upload ceilings, and retention periods depend on your plan and on the documentation the vendor publishes for that tier.
Is CODiii only for very large firms?
- Published tiers begin with Starter for solo practitioners and small studios, add Studio for growing multi-team offices, and add Firm for large organizations with higher limits and custom integration needs. Choose based on seat count and document volume rather than assuming the product is enterprise-only.
How is CODiii different from a general-purpose AI chatbot?
- Marketing material stresses answers grounded in uploaded project files, optional web augmentation disabled by default, and links that point to the passages behind each claim. Broad chat tools rarely provide that file-specific traceability for AEC deliverables.